Turing
Palo Alto AGI-services company with an AI-vetted remote talent cloud
What is Turing?
Turing was founded in 2018 by Jonathan Siddharth and Vijay Krishnan and lists its headquarters in Palo Alto, California. It began as a remote-developer matching platform and now has two businesses: a talent cloud that vets, matches and manages remote engineers, and AI services for frontier labs and enterprises. The company describes a network of millions of developers in more than 140 countries (per company website; independently unverifiable) and a Series E valuation of about $2.2 billion. Placed engineers are contractors sourced through the platform.
Turing works primarily with clients in SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare, Retail sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Talent cloud tied to frontier-lab LLM training work.
Turing tech stack and services
| Service area |
|---|
| ML Engineers |
| LLM Engineers |
| AI Agent Developers |
| Talent Marketplace |
Turing pricing
Short answer: Turing uses a hourly or monthly contracts; rates on request pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Full-time dedicated engineers | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Part-time fractional experts | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Managed delivery | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Turing pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Engineers who have worked on LLM training and evaluation projects | -Contractor model gives less continuity than employed agency engineers |
| +Huge candidate pool across time zones | -Company focus has shifted toward AI lab services, which may change the staffing product |
| +Automated vetting shortens the first shortlist | -Network-size claims are self-reported |
Turing vs alternatives
How Turing compares to the other top AI Staffing agencies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensorway | Product teams adding AI engineers fast, two-week trial. | Engineer-led screening with a free replacement if a hire doesn't fit | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| deepsense.ai | Research-heavy ML problems, senior data scientists. | Research-grade data scientists available as embedded team members | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| BairesDev | U.S. companies needing several engineers in American time... | Largest employed LatAm engineering bench on this list | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Azumo | Startups adding GenAI engineers on U.S. hours. | Nearshore staffing with a hiring focus on GenAI and agent roles | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| InData Labs | Data-science-heavy teams, AWS-based ML work. | Data scientists and data engineers from one AI-only company | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| MobiDev | Retail and fitness products, one AI engineer to... | Long AI product record in retail, hospitality and fitness | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Uvik Software | Python-heavy AI products, quick shortlist. | Python-only bench with published entry-level rates | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises scaling data and ML teams in Europe. | Formal staff-augmentation model backed by a 2,400-person bench | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| BEON.tech | U.S. scale-ups hiring long-term LatAm AI engineers. | Senior-only LatAm placements with AWS Bedrock experience | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Xenoss | Ad-tech and high-volume data teams. | Data engineers with ad-tech throughput experience | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Svitla Systems | Companies wanting both Mexican and Polish delivery options. | Two decades of team augmentation across LatAm and Europe | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Mobilunity | Budget-conscious teams hiring a dedicated AI developer. | Recruits each hire to your spec at one of the lower rate bands here | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Vention | Startups and scale-ups wanting CVs within two days. | Fast CV turnaround with a free delivery manager | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Neoteric | Product teams adding GenAI to an existing app. | Product-minded GenAI engineers with a low published minimum | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| STX Next | Python product teams adding ML capacity. | Large Python bench with documented ML staff-augmentation work | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| 10Clouds | Banks, insurers and fintechs building AI features. | Financial-services AI focus with Claude partner status | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Howdy.com | Teams that want transparent nearshore pricing. | Published 15% fee on top of the engineer's pay | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Toptal | Short engagements with a senior freelance specialist. | Fast access to screened freelancers with a no-risk trial | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Simform | Azure-based companies wanting a lower-cost dedicated AI team. | Azure-centered AI engineering at India delivery rates | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Innowise | Enterprises needing many seats filled within days. | Claimed three-to-five-day placement from an employed bench | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| X-Team | Media and gaming teams adding long-term remote developers. | Developer-community model aimed at long placements | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Netguru | Consumer brands adding AI to digital products. | Design and product talent alongside AI engineers | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | Automotive and mobility companies, embedded AI. | Physical-AI and automotive engineering depth | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | Regulated industries hiring experienced data scientists. | Senior data scientists with a published hiring timeline | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Andela | Distributed teams hiring vetted contractors worldwide. | Assessment tooling strengthened by the 2026 Woven acquisition | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | Financial and travel firms needing long-lived dedicated teams. | Dedicated development centers with nearly 30 years of history | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| KORE1 | U.S. companies that want to hire AI engineers... | Direct-hire and contract-to-hire paths for AI roles | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Revelo | Companies hiring LatAm developers without a local entity. | Payroll and compliance handled for LatAm hires | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | Global enterprises with large, compliance-heavy AI programs. | Scale, compliance maturity and vendor certifications | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Globant | Enterprises open to outcome-priced AI delivery. | Token-subscription pricing in place of seat-based staffing | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Itransition | Microsoft-stack enterprises adding AI to Dynamics or Power... | AI work tied to the Microsoft business-application stack | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Companies already using The Hackett Group or ZBrain. | GenAI developers tied to the ZBrain platform | 3.8 | Full comparison |
Turing FAQ
What is Turing?
Palo Alto AGI-services company with an AI-vetted remote talent cloud
How much does Turing charge?
Turing uses hourly or monthly contracts; rates on request pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Turing use?
Turing works with Python, PyTorch, OpenAI, LangChain, Hugging Face, AWS. Primary industries served include SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare, Retail.
Is Turing right for enterprise?
Companies wanting LLM-savvy contractors from a large pool. 500+ staff; global contractor network team size. Key consideration: Contractor model gives less continuity than employed agency engineers.
What are the best Turing alternatives?
The best alternatives to Turing depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Tensorway: engineer-led screening with a free replacement if a hire doesn't fit
- deepsense.ai: research-grade data scientists available as embedded team members
- BairesDev: largest employed latam engineering bench on this list
Compare Turing with other AI Staffing agencies
Verify all details directly with Turing before making a decision.